PowerPCs: Power Mac 6300-120 / Mac Performa 6320

History

The Performa 6300 had introduced the PowerPC 603e processor to the wonderful world of Macintosh but the 6320 upped performance from 100MHz to 120MHz. This was sadly the only difference between the two machines and, sadly, there were still the same problems that plagued the Performa series ever since the original 6200.

The processor still ran in a 'crippled' state (due to the 32 bit data bus), the IDE controller was still of the 8-bit variety (slowing things down further), and the modem, printer and SCSI ports could all cause network stability issues. Yes the 6300 series had introduced 16 bit sound in and had increased the base memory, hard disk size, and CD-ROM speed but at the end of the day, the 6300 series suffered from exactly the same problems as the 6200 series and it did little to enhance Apple's reputation.


Specifications


Machine Power Macintosh 6300-120 / Macintosh Performa 6320
Introduced 04/1996
Retired
Cost $2499
System 7.5.1-9.1
Code Name(s) Crusader, Elixir
CPU/Speed Motorola PPC 603e @ 120MHz
RAM Min/Max 16Mb/64Mb (70ns - 2x72 pin SIMM slot)
ROM (Size) 4Mb
Floppy Drive 1xSuperDrive
Hard Drive 1.2Gb IDE
CD Drive 8xCD-ROM
Drive Bay(s) 1x3.5" Half-height, 1x5.25" Half-height
Network LocalTalk
Audio 16 bit stereo, stereo in
Video 1Mb
Resolution(s) 640x480 (16 bit), 800x600 (8 bit)
Ports 2xSerial, SCSI(25 pin), 1xADB, 1xVideo
Expansion Slot 1xPDS, 1xComm Slot, 1xVideo
Dimensions 4.3" x 12.6" x 16.5"
Weight 19 lb


From Experience...

When I came by my 6320 my only other experience of PowerMacs had been the less than mindblowing Performa 6200. Why did I buy another then? Well, as the old expression goes, a fool and his money...

Despite the technical facts that the 6320 and the 6200 are just about the same machine, in practice...they're just about the same machine. The 6320 is just as dull, boring and uninspiring as the 6200 and from a usability point of view they both offered the same features: both had CD drives, both could be upgraded with 72 pin SIMMs, and both would run some apps that 68K Macs wouldn't. Even popping the hood (when you eventually figure out how to)(Tip: Take off the front, push the top forward and off, and then slide the side panels off) reveals nothing very interesting. I suppose the only item of any interest is the heat sink on the processor - hardly rivetting.

The 6320 was the first machine that threw OS 8 at me and first impressions of this were good. Ok so I was more concerned with the aesthetics rather than functionality but it's a decent little OS and has some nice features that mark it out from OS 7 (again, mostly aesthetic but...).

As a final word though, my 6320 is incredibly temperamental - sometimes it'll boot, sometimes it won't. Don't ask me why as I've stripped it down many times and drawn a blank on every occasion. At the end of the day though it just doesn't inspire me in the slightest, and my iMacs blow it out of the water performance wise - looks like we have another machine that'll do nothing but collect dust for a while.

Note: Given how truly awful (and temperamental) my 6320 was it's now been stripped down for parts. I desperately needed the power supply for a Performa 630 (who's own PSU had given up the ghost) and as I rate 68K Macs above PowerMacs I wasn't too difficult a decision to make. I have kept the motherboard though so if it's ever needed I can pop it into the Performa 630 and away we go!


Links


LowEndMac.com - Looking for Apple info? Always start here


Site designed and maintained by TheNeil. While all content is checked and updated regularly, the author cannot be held responsible for any broken links, incorrect information or damage caused to hardware or software. Comments, contributions and criticism always gratefully received.

See that? That's the number of fools that have found their way here

Site Last Updated: 11/04/2009 11:26:21